Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date: 2018-04-08 05:32:29
Message-ID: 87y3hygtiy.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "David" == David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

David> I've attached my proposed fix for the unstable regression tests.
David> I removed the vacuums I'd added in the last version and
David> commented why we're doing set enable_indesonlyscan = off;

Looks basically sane - I'll try it out and commit it shortly.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 05:41:21 pgsql: Attempt to stabilize partition_prune test output.
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 05:09:52 pgsql: Support index INCLUDE in the AM properties interface.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2018-04-08 05:36:00 Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-04-08 04:58:57 Re: lazy detoasting