Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date: 2018-04-08 06:37:34
Message-ID: 20180408063734.titqzcvrzvrlp2bj@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "David" == David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> David> I've attached my proposed fix for the unstable regression tests.
> David> I removed the vacuums I'd added in the last version and
> David> commented why we're doing set enable_indesonlyscan = off;
>
> Looks basically sane - I'll try it out and commit it shortly.

Thanks for cleaning that up. I'll look into why the test (without this
commit) fails with force_parallel_mode=regress next week.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 07:31:48 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 05:41:21 pgsql: Attempt to stabilize partition_prune test output.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 07:31:48 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-08 06:01:26 Re: lazy detoasting