Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date: 2025-11-12 10:55:47
Message-ID: 87y0ob7c5o.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 01:22:49PM -0600, Bryan Green wrote:
>> I have attached v4 of the patch after correcting some whitespace errors
>> and a struct that didn't need the pgoff_t modification as requested by
>> Thomas. I also have attached Michael's patch where both patches can be
>> found by cfbot for the commitfest.
>
> Thanks. As the stamps have been pushed for the next minor release, I
> have applied and backpatched the meson check for now. I'll look at
> your patch next, for HEAD.

I just noticed that the check is for 2GB, but the error message says
1GB.

- ilmari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2025-11-12 10:57:56 Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2025-11-12 10:55:32 Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?