Re: add support for logging current role (what to review?)

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add support for logging current role (what to review?)
Date: 2011-07-01 18:07:33
Message-ID: 87wrg127tm.fsf@casanova1.SEINGALT
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:

> * Alex Hunsaker (badalex(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> I think if Stephen was proposing 10 fields, or if there was a list of
>> fields we were planning on adding in the next release or 3, it might
>> be worth re-factoring.
>
> I know of at least one person (in an earlier piece of the thread
> discussing this patch) who was talking about other fields they'd like
> included in the CSV log which aren't currently. I don't recall what
> that was though, but I think it might have been something like line #
> from inside stored procedures..
>

well, while not in this thread i have been advocating that we should have a
column for duration... that way pg tools won't need to look for
"duration" (which makes those tools useless in non-english
installations)

--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL
Soporte 24x7, desarrollo, capacitación y servicios

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2011-07-01 19:02:48 Re: add support for logging current role (what to review?)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-01 17:59:48 Re: relpersistence and temp table