Re: Controlling hot standby

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Controlling hot standby
Date: 2009-01-23 15:13:46
Message-ID: 87vds6kqc5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Is 'hot standby' going to be the official moniker for the feature?
>> (not 'standby replication', or something else?). I wonder if we
>> should pick something more descriptive.
>
> Could also be something like "allow_connections_during_recovery".
>
> I'd keep the word "replication" out of this..

Just wondering, but does this make more sense as a recovery.conf parameter?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-23 15:14:04 Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-01-23 15:12:38 Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted