Re: streaming result sets: progress

Thomas O'Dowd <tom(at)nooper(dot)com> writes:

> > 3) I think the transaction characteristics of the current patch are just
> > fine and conform to the jdbc specification. The code should
> > automatically close the resultset when a commit occurs. One thing that
> > will be confusing is that noncursor based result sets will work accross
> > commits, but cursor based ones won't. But I think that is reasonable.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me as long as its clear to the programmer what type
> they are using. I definitely don't want to see the noncursor based
> resultsets closed, but I can't see a better solution for cursor based
> ones...

How can we make clear what type of ResultSet is being used?

Nic