Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "pgsql-general General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Date: 2007-07-17 04:19:46
Message-ID: 87lkdfek65.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> They could roll their own a lot easier if you had finished the psql
> concurrent patch.

I did. But you decided you didn't want it.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 04:26:23 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Previous Message Perry Smith 2007-07-17 04:15:02 Concurrency Question