Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Date: 2007-07-17 04:26:23
Message-ID: 200707170426.l6H4QNZ29451@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>
> > They could roll their own a lot easier if you had finished the psql
> > concurrent patch.
>
> I did. But you decided you didn't want it.

As far as I know, we asked for a libpq API change and you ignored
multiple requests. You want the URLs?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 04:29:28 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-17 04:19:46 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS