Re: Properly pathify the union planner

From: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Properly pathify the union planner
Date: 2024-02-18 09:07:50
Message-ID: 87jzn2gmwh.fsf@163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

>>
>> The two if-clauses looks unnecessary, it should be handled by
>> pathkeys_count_contained_in already. The same issue exists in
>> pathkeys_useful_for_ordering as well. Attached patch fix it in master.
>
> I agree. I'd rather not have those redundant checks in
> pathkeys_useful_for_setop(), and I do want those functions to be as
> similar as possible. So I think adjusting it in master is a good
> idea.
>
> I've pushed your patch.
>
Thanks for the pushing!

--
Best Regards
Andy Fan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2024-02-18 11:14:21 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
Previous Message Sutou Kouhei 2024-02-18 08:38:09 Re: Why is pq_begintypsend so slow?