Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
Date: 2015-03-21 23:46:48
Message-ID: 87iodtex6j.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Petr" == Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

>> So wouldn't it make more sense to move these definitions into c.h and
>> standardize their usage?

Petr> I was thinking the same when I've seen Peter's version of Numeric
Petr> abbreviations patch. So +1 for that.

Suggested patch attached.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

Attachment Content-Type Size
int64_minmax.patch text/x-patch 6.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-21 23:47:12 PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2015-03-21 22:50:12 Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX