| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |
| Date: | 2015-03-22 05:19:52 |
| Message-ID: | 874mpdehka.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>>>>> "Petr" == Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> So wouldn't it make more sense to move these definitions into c.h and
>>> standardize their usage?
Petr> I was thinking the same when I've seen Peter's version of Numeric
Petr> abbreviations patch. So +1 for that.
Hm, it looks like the same could be said for INT32_MIN and _MAX; some
places use INT_MIN etc., others say "we shouldn't assume int = int32"
and use (-0x7fffffff - 1) or whatever instead.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-22 05:22:25 | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-22 05:17:28 | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |