Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
Date: 2019-02-03 07:43:57
Message-ID: 87h8dl7259.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Lætitia" == Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

[snip patch]

The spec doesn't require the inverse functions (asinh, acosh, atanh),
but surely there is no principled reason to omit them?

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-02-03 08:00:19 Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-02-03 07:37:17 Re: Removing \cset from pgbench