Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance
Date: 2019-02-03 15:12:13
Message-ID: 4117.1549206733@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> The spec doesn't require the inverse functions (asinh, acosh, atanh),
> but surely there is no principled reason to omit them?

+1 --- AFAICS, the C library has offered all six since C89.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-02-03 15:18:48 Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-02-03 13:06:08 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables