Re: code question: storing INTO relation

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Date: 2004-10-22 23:29:52
Message-ID: 87fz46wcun.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

> I agree, hence why this should be a user option. The usage of this is
> restricted to particular classes of database usage: data warehousing or
> very large database applications. This isn't intended for use in OLTP or
> web-site databases.

Well a lot of users also just don't use online backups. For these users
there's no downside to CREATE INDEX/REINDEX/CREATE TABLE AS not logging.

The logging is not needed for a regular recovery, only for restoring from
and a backup older than the table/index creation.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-10-23 01:42:06 Re: [Slony1-general] Re: [GENERAL] Slony-I 1.0.4 Released
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-22 22:24:36 Re: check over the tar files ...