From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it? |
Date: | 2017-10-01 13:27:56 |
Message-ID: | 87d76454-b55d-5997-18b0-f39b66e545f4@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/29/17 19:38, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Reading over this code again, it is admittedly not quite clear why this
>> "canonicalization" is in there right now. I think it had something to
>> do with how we built the keyword variants at one point. It might not
>> make sense. I'd be glad to take that out and use the result straight
>> from uloc_getAvailable() for collcollate. That is, after all, the
>> "canonical" version that ICU chooses to report to us.
>
> Is anything going to happen here ahead of shipping v10? This remains
> an open item.
I'm still pondering committing my documentation patch I had posted, and
I've been reviewing your patches to see if there is anything else
documentation-wise that could be added.
As I had mentioned before, I disagree with the substance of the
functionality changes you are proposing, and I think it would be way too
late to make such significant changes. The general community opinion
also seems to be in favor of letting things be.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-10-01 13:31:01 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-10-01 13:20:38 | Re: list of credits for release notes |