Re: C function question

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, General Postgres Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C function question
Date: 2009-02-04 13:14:42
Message-ID: 87d4dymji5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>>> looks like it really has to be defined with "char" in double quotes. I
>>> thought just char is enough...
>
>> They're different types.
>
> You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about
> this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we
> rename it to char1 or something like that?

int1?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2009-02-04 13:15:54 Re: Crash of Postgresql on Windows
Previous Message Tommy Gildseth 2009-02-04 13:14:29 Re: Crash of Postgresql on Windows