Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Date: 2019-03-02 01:55:11
Message-ID: 8794044e-c0e5-6be3-a7c2-a11543f173a3@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 3/1/19 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> So I propose shortly to commit this patch unconditionally demoting the
>> message to DEBUG1.
> No patch referenced, but I assume you mean only for the
> zero-bytes-received case, right? No objection if so.
>
>

Patch proposed by Christoph Berg is here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190228151336.GB7550%40msg.df7cb.de

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-02 03:25:50 Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-02 01:50:22 Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay?