Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Date: 2019-03-01 23:49:57
Message-ID: 4295.1551484197@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> So I propose shortly to commit this patch unconditionally demoting the
> message to DEBUG1.

No patch referenced, but I assume you mean only for the
zero-bytes-received case, right? No objection if so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-01 23:59:29 VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-01 23:46:43 Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero