Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> I was under the impression that refcursor returning functions would fade
> with the advent of easier set returning functions. Have you considered
> using them instead? The advantage of returning refcursor seems to me that
> you don't need to create a pseudo type for the return value, or deal with
> specifying record types in the query. Are there other advantages I'm
> missing?
Portability. Efficiency.
Nic