| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Edmund Dengler <edmundd(at)eSentire(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning |
| Date: | 2005-06-16 05:10:36 |
| Message-ID: | 873brianub.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> If you really do need that many, you can go to the trouble of grouping
> them in two levels of nesting, so you have a root table, multiple month
> tables and then each month table with multiple day tables (etc).
I wonder if testing deeply nested inheritance graphs would show up an entirely
different set of problem areas.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-06-16 05:14:17 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-06-16 04:59:19 | Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-06-16 05:14:17 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-16 05:10:24 | Re: max_fsm_pages >800k ... ? |