Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Edmund Dengler <edmundd(at)eSentire(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning
Date: 2005-06-16 06:52:00
Message-ID: 1118904720.3645.171.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 01:10 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> > If you really do need that many, you can go to the trouble of grouping
> > them in two levels of nesting, so you have a root table, multiple month
> > tables and then each month table with multiple day tables (etc).
>
> I wonder if testing deeply nested inheritance graphs would show up an entirely
> different set of problem areas.

I'm not sure two or three levels is "deeply nested", but I suspect you
are correct.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-06-16 07:15:36 Re: How to set an expiration date for a WHOLE user account
Previous Message Ilja Golshtein 2005-06-16 06:32:00 DATATYPE for HEX

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-06-16 08:07:32 Re: [HACKERS] INHERITS and planning
Previous Message Martin Pitt 2005-06-16 06:41:54 Re: Add PG version number to NLS files