From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow COPY to use parameters |
Date: | 2016-05-24 22:13:53 |
Message-ID: | 8737p7kt0g.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Merlin" == Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
Merlin> Hm, what's the use case preparing COPY?
Preparing it isn't necessarily the point (and SQL-level PREPARE is not
addressed in that patch). The point is to allow parameters, so that a
client can do
COPY (select blah from whatever where thing = $1) TO ...
without having to mess around with interpolations.
Merlin> Note, the biggest pain point I have with COPY is not being able
Merlin> to parameterize the filename argument.
Certainly that can be handled too.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-05-24 22:22:01 | Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta |
Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= | 2016-05-24 22:12:05 | Re: To-Do item: skip table scan for adding column with provable check constraints |