Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver

From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>
To: Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver
Date: 1998-04-17 18:38:02
Message-ID: 86yax4cn05.fsf@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> I do not know what the internal representation is but they are
> displayed by psql as either dd-mm-yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy depending on
> whether the server has -o -e or not. As in most parts of the world,
> Australia uses dd-mm-yyyy as a standard.

Well, no. I have no idea which is more common of the two you mention,
but the majority of the people of this world actually use the ISO 8601
standard representation: yyyy-mm-dd.

-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Byron Nikolaidis 1998-04-17 20:13:42 Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file
Previous Message Dario Fumagalli 1998-04-17 18:25:03 R: [INTERFACES] Re: Possible bugs in ODBC driver