From: | Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver |
Date: | 1998-04-17 18:38:02 |
Message-ID: | 86yax4cn05.fsf@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I do not know what the internal representation is but they are
> displayed by psql as either dd-mm-yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy depending on
> whether the server has -o -e or not. As in most parts of the world,
> Australia uses dd-mm-yyyy as a standard.
Well, no. I have no idea which is more common of the two you mention,
but the majority of the people of this world actually use the ISO 8601
standard representation: yyyy-mm-dd.
-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 1998-04-17 20:13:42 | Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file |
Previous Message | Dario Fumagalli | 1998-04-17 18:25:03 | R: [INTERFACES] Re: Possible bugs in ODBC driver |