Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 26.10.26 16:42, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Named POSIX semaphores are not a credible replacement for SysV
>> semaphores, because of their performance issues (which are just
>> as real on macOS as anywhere else). So I think the direction we'd
>> have to go in to make that happen is to replace all the semaphore
>> stuff with futexes or some other low-level primitive, as Munro
>> speculated about in one of the threads I cited.
> Ok, I'm withdrawing my comment.
OK, pushed with the minor corrections suggested upthread.
regards, tom lane