Re: Add additional information to src/test/ssl/README

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Kevin Burke <kevin(at)burke(dot)dev>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add additional information to src/test/ssl/README
Date: 2021-10-30 20:48:40
Message-ID: 856718.1635626920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to start collecting troubleshooting advice in
> src/test/perl/README and instead refer to that in the boilerplate? I notice
> that we don't document for example PG_TEST_NOCLEAN anywhere (which admittedly
> is my fault), a trubleshooting section in that file would be a good fit.

Yeah, we could try to move all the repetitive stuff to there. I was a bit
allergic to the idea of having README files refer to webpages, because you
might be offline --- but referencing a different README doesn't have that
issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-10-30 21:21:01 parallel vacuum comments
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-10-30 19:10:32 Re: Vulnerability identified with Postgres 13.4 for Windows