Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Date: 2017-04-05 15:06:32
Message-ID: 8559.1491404792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-04-05 10:48:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd really rather not. It might be safe here, because this code
>> only works on Linux anyway, but it's still a dangerous precedent.

> Well, what's the alternative for v10? There's already precedent btw.,
> cf plperl.h undefining bool.

Well, the 0001a patch amounted to undefining bool, once you drop
the redundant typedef redeclaration. So that's a direction we have
some track record with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-04-05 15:07:02 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 15:02:09 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test