On Jul 10, 2025, at 13:41, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The basic problem I see with these latest revisions/refactorings is that they fail for pg_upgrade afaict.
> Probably this means that some of the rearrangements on the parser/scanner are not that flexible.
Oh, is that what’s happening? What needs to happen to properly support pg_upgrade?
Best,
David