Re: Logical replication subscription owner

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, chris+postgresql(at)qwirx(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Logical replication subscription owner
Date: 2020-04-22 23:14:41
Message-ID: 8465.1587597281@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I had it in my mind that LOGIN was for regular (SQL-based) login, and
> REPLICATION was for replication login, and that they were orthogonal.

Yeah, that's what I would've expected. Otherwise, is REPLICATION
without LOGIN useful at all?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-22 23:36:54 Re: Lack of detailed documentation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-04-22 22:59:11 Re: Logical replication subscription owner

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-04-22 23:35:55 Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-22 23:11:05 Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning