Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Match(dot)Grun(at)thomson(dot)com
Subject: Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Date: 2006-09-27 13:51:37
Message-ID: 8453.1159365097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the
> compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of
> libraries. If -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but
> question was if float optimalization should generate some problems.

So FAQ_Solaris needs to tell people to put -fast in both CFLAGS and
LDFLAGS?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-27 13:56:10 Re: Buildfarm alarms
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-27 13:49:26 Re: Faster StrNCpy