Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Match(dot)Grun(at)thomson(dot)com
Subject: Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Date: 2006-09-27 14:09:18
Message-ID: 451A860E.8080604@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the
>> compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of
>> libraries. If -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but
>> question was if float optimalization should generate some problems.
>
> So FAQ_Solaris needs to tell people to put -fast in both CFLAGS and
> LDFLAGS?

Exactly, but I want to sure, that float optimalization is safe and
should be applied for postgres, because -fast breaks IEE754 standard. If
it is OK I will adjust FAQ_Solaris.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-09-27 14:10:06 Re: Buildfarm alarms
Previous Message Strong, David 2006-09-27 14:08:05 Re: Faster StrNCpy