Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta?
Date: 1999-04-27 14:25:39
Message-ID: 8268.925223139@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> SELECT story.approved, story.oid FROM story, webuser, category* WHERE
> story.webuser = webuser.oid AND story.category = category.oid and
> approved;
> [ fails to find tuples it should find ]

Youch. I could not duplicate that here on a toy example, which may
mean there is a recently-fixed bug, or it may just mean that there
are additional conditions required to trigger the bug.

What does EXPLAIN say about the plans used for the two queries?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-04-27 14:28:32 Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5
Previous Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-04-27 14:02:27 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison