Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date: 2025-09-28 14:20:29
Message-ID: 815016.1759069229@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Do we want to specifically check “ctid”?

No. Complete waste of effort.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-09-28 14:35:19 Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11)
Previous Message Xuneng Zhou 2025-09-28 13:47:06 Re: Improve read_local_xlog_page_guts by replacing polling with latch-based waiting