Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three
Date: 2018-07-06 01:49:50
Message-ID: 803d41ca-88d2-98c6-ceeb-f50f3aead80b@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/07/06 6:55, David Rowley wrote:
> On 6 July 2018 at 09:41, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2018-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Committed.
>>
>> Thanks for handling this.
>>
>> Should we do this in REL_11_STABLE too? I vote yes.
>
> Sorry for now paying much attention to this, but I've read through
> what's been committed and I also think PG11 deserves this too.

+1

Thanks Justin and Peter.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-06 01:52:27 Re: Global shared meta cache
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-07-06 01:47:05 Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend