Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Date: 2023-02-14 20:19:22
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/14/23 3:17 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> On 2023-01-23 00:58:40 -0500, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> Here is another attempt at this patch that takes into account the SCRAM code
>> refactor. I addressed some of Daniel's previous feedback, but will need to
>> make another pass on the docs and the assert trace as the main focus of this
>> revision was bringing the code inline with the recent changes.
> This reliably fails on CI:
> I think this is related to encoding issues. The 32bit debian task
> intentionally uses LANG=C. Resulting in failures like:
> Windows fails with a similar issue:
> I've set the patch as waiting on author for now.

Thanks for the explanation. I'll work on fixing that in the next go round.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-14 20:21:45 Re: Possible false valgrind error reports
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-14 20:17:45 Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets