Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Date: 2023-02-14 20:17:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-01-23 00:58:40 -0500, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Here is another attempt at this patch that takes into account the SCRAM code
> refactor. I addressed some of Daniel's previous feedback, but will need to
> make another pass on the docs and the assert trace as the main focus of this
> revision was bringing the code inline with the recent changes.

This reliably fails on CI:

I think this is related to encoding issues. The 32bit debian task
intentionally uses LANG=C. Resulting in failures like:

Windows fails with a similar issue:

I've set the patch as waiting on author for now.

- Andres

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-02-14 20:19:22 Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-14 20:13:18 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page