| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences |
| Date: | 2008-07-24 17:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 8023.1216919364@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>> Another issue is the interaction with the planned column-level GRANT
>> feature.
> Although that is a feature we want, is a WIP one... do we stop patches
> because it can conflict with a project we don't know will be applied
> soon?
Well, considering that that one is implementing a feature required by
SQL spec, your feature will lose any tug-of-war ;-). So yeah, you
ought to consider how to make yours play nice when (not if) that
happens.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-24 17:20:42 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-24 17:01:35 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-24 17:20:42 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-24 17:01:35 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |