Re: postgres not use table access permissions ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Partyka Robert <bobson(at)saturn(dot)alpha(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres not use table access permissions ?
Date: 2000-11-03 20:19:52
Message-ID: 8002.973282792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Oops. Strange though, this looks like it must be a very long-standing
> bug: aclinsert3 thinks it can delete any zero-permissions item from an
> ACL array, whereas aclcheck has a hard-wired assumption that the world
> item is always there. Could we have missed this for this long?

Yup, we could've. It looks like "revoke all from public" has been
broken clear back to Postgres95, if not longer. Amazing that no one
noticed. Anyway, fixed now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2000-11-03 20:29:32 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0.3 branded
Previous Message Ian Lance Taylor 2000-11-03 20:07:44 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0.3 branded