From: | Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | ian(at)airs(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 7.0.3 branded |
Date: | 2000-11-03 20:29:32 |
Message-ID: | 20001103202932.15421.qmail@daffy.airs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:11:00 -0500 (EST)
cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES
I want just log entries that are part of the branch. I get all entries.
What I see when I try this is that for files which have the
REL7_0_PATCHES tag (i.e., files which are on the branch), I see only
log entries for the branch. For files which are do not have the
REL7_0_PATCHES tag (i.e., are not on the branch), I see all log
entries.
For example, in the top pgsql directory,
cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES HISTORY
gives me only log entries for the branch for the HISTORY file.
However,
cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES GNUmakefile.in
gives me all log entries. It also gives me this warning:
cvs server: warning: no revision `REL7_0_PATCHES' in `/home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/GNUmakefile.in,v'
Is this also what you see?
The natural way to fix this ought to be
cvs co -rREL7_0_PATCHES pgsql
cvs log .
Unfortunately, I tried it, and cvs log, I believe erroneously, seems
to pick up all files in the directory, even if they have not been
checked out.
I can tell you a hideous kludge to avoid this, but I can't claim that
it is the way to operate. Check out the branch using the -r option as
above. Then do this:
find . -name CVS -type d -exec touch '{}/Entries.Static' \;
After that, in the same directory, do
cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES
I'd hate to have to explain why that works.
Which version of CVS are you running on the server? When I find some
time I'll see about fixing cvs log.
Ian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-03 20:34:44 | Re: Re[2]: postgres not use table access permissions ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-03 20:19:52 | Re: postgres not use table access permissions ? |