Re: Triage on old commitfest entries

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triage on old commitfest entries
Date: 2021-10-05 10:57:07
Message-ID: 7fe0f1ec-5f48-15b2-7cac-a943eef4f74d@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/5/21 4:29 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)bowt(dot)ie) wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 1:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Fair. My concern here is mostly that we not just keep kicking the
>>> can down the road. If we see that a patch has been hanging around
>>> this long without reaching commit, we should either kill it or
>>> form a specific plan for how to advance it.
>>
>> Also fair.
>>
>> The pandemic has made the kind of coordination I refer to harder in
>> practice. It's the kind of thing that face to face communication
>> really helps with.
>
> Entirely agree with this. Index skip scan is actually *ridiculously*
> useful in terms of an improvement, and we need to get the right people
> together to work on it and get it implemented. I'd love to see this
> done for v15, in particular. Who do we need to coordinate getting
> together to make it happen? I doubt that I'm alone in wanting to make
> this happen and I'd be pretty surprised if we weren't able to bring the
> right folks together this fall to make it a reality.
I don't have the skills to work on either side of this, but I would like
to voice my support in favor of having this feature and I would be happy
to help test it on a user level (as opposed to reviewing code).
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-10-05 11:11:32 Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2021-10-05 10:50:12 Re: Next Steps with Hash Indexes