Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask
Date: 2018-03-14 18:15:03
Message-ID: 7f1e7a26-dfec-4a38-a0b0-a99023584b0e@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael,

On 3/13/18 9:31 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:19:07PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> I'll attach new patches in a reply to [1] once I have made the changes
>> Tom requested.
>
> Cool, thanks for your patience. Looking forward to seeing those. I'll
> spend time on 0003 at the same time. Let's also put the additional
> umask calls for pg_rewind and pg_resetwal into a separate patch.

Do you mean a separate patch in this patch set, or a separate patch
entirely? 02 depends on this logic, so I guess you mean create a new
patch between 01 and 02?

Are you just trying to make sure it gets in? I'd rather wait a bit - if
02 doesn't look like it will get in, then I'll pull this logic out into
a separate patch.

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2018-03-14 19:10:27 Re: Ambigous Plan - Larger Table on Hash Side
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-03-14 18:14:05 Re: Parallel index creation does not properly cleanup after error