| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |
| Date: | 2018-03-15 06:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20180315062110.GF617@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:15:03PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> Do you mean a separate patch in this patch set, or a separate patch
> entirely? 02 depends on this logic, so I guess you mean create a new
> patch between 01 and 02?
Yes, one new patch that which can be applied on top of 1.
> Are you just trying to make sure it gets in? I'd rather wait a bit - if
> 02 doesn't look like it will get in, then I'll pull this logic out into
> a separate patch.
Okay.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-15 07:17:39 | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-15 06:09:54 | Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs |