Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2019-02-16 21:33:04
Message-ID: 7c9a902b-2465-a2fd-395a-59f4eba212de@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/16/19 4:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
>>>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically
>>>>> correct, and uses an existing word.
>
>>>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
>>>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql
>
>>> Seconded!
>
>> +1 to MATERIALIZED too
>
> I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way.

This is awesome. Thank you everyone for working on this!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-02-16 21:40:23 Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-16 21:14:49 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs