Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2019-02-16 21:14:49
Message-ID: 31353.1550351689@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
>>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically
>>>> correct, and uses an existing word.

>>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
>>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql

>> Seconded!

> +1 to MATERIALIZED too

I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2019-02-16 21:33:04 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2019-02-16 20:38:03 Re: Reviving the "Stopping logical replication protocol" patch from Vladimir Gordichuk