Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
Date: 2022-09-06 01:45:48
Message-ID: 7b52105d-b1ae-1c51-1794-2280e7c8cf06@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/5/22 7:18 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:08 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> At Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:15:27 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>>> At Mon, 5 Sep 2022 16:54:07 +1200, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>>>> On reflection, it'd be better not to clobber any pre-existing error
>>>> there, but report one only if there isn't one already queued. I've
>>>> done that in this version, which I'm planning to do a bit more testing
>>>> on and commit soonish if there are no comments/objections, especially
>>>> for that part.
>
> Well I was about to commit this, but beta4 just got stamped (but not
> yet tagged). I see now that Jonathan (with RMT hat on, CC'd) meant
> commits should be in by the *start* of the 5th AoE, not the end. So
> the procedural/RMT question is whether it's still possible to close
> this item in beta4.

Presumably because Tom stamped it, the released is wrapped so it
wouldn't make Beta 4, but I defer to him to see if it can be included
with the tag.

That said, if it doesn't make it for Beta 4, it would be in the next
release (which is hopefully RC1).

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-06 01:51:38 Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-09-06 01:29:01 Re: Fix possible bogus array out of bonds (src/backend/access/brin/brin_minmax_multi.c)