Re: Online checksums patch - once again

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Date: 2020-09-24 07:24:19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Sep 2020, at 06:27, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> While in the patch I realized that the relationlist saved the relkind but the
>> code wasn't actually using it, so I've gone ahead and removed that with a lot
>> fewer palloc calls as a result. The attached v22 fixes that and the above.
> Some of the TAP tests are blowing up here, as the CF bot is telling:
> t/ .. 1/11 # Looks like you planned 11 tests but ran 4.
> # Looks like your test exited with 29 just after 4.
> t/ .. Dubious, test returned 29 (wstat 7424, 0x1d00)

Interesting, I've been unable to trigger a fault and the latest Travis build
was green. I'll continue to try and see if I can shake something loose.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Katsuragi Yuta 2020-09-24 07:32:51 Re: [PATCH] Add features to pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-24 07:12:53 Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration