Re: Fundamental error in "no WAL log" index/file creation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fundamental error in "no WAL log" index/file creation
Date: 2005-06-26 13:37:46
Message-ID: 7824.1119793066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> The other annoyance this redesign would fix is the createdb failures
>> because the template DB is in use.

> This one should be largely fixed by provision of another default
> connection target, which is in the pipeline.

Yeah, but that's a workaround not a solution. It's still one of the
issues I would like to see fixed by a still-hypothetical CREATE DATABASE
redesign.

There are many more-pressing problems of course, so I don't see anything
being done about CREATE DATABASE for a good while.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-26 13:52:03 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-26 13:29:20 Re: Open items