Re: doc: Improve description of io_combine_limit and io_max_combine_limit GUCs

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: Improve description of io_combine_limit and io_max_combine_limit GUCs
Date: 2025-10-13 13:32:40
Message-ID: 778338E0-3EF4-4C56-A944-678008789738@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Oct 13, 2025, at 19:33, Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:05 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> So, this patch looks good to me. Please any committer takes care of this patch.
>>
>
> Thank you for the review!
>
> Could you please change the status of the commitfest entry [1] to
> Ready for Commiter if you believe it's ready?
>
> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6115/
>

Done.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2025-10-13 14:22:24 Re: add function argument name to substring and substr
Previous Message Nishant Sharma 2025-10-13 13:19:39 Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation?