Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Date: 2018-06-20 04:17:14
Message-ID: 7675.1529468234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked.

> c992dca2 did not change anything about ldap packages. Are the ones
> listed for RHEL and FreeBSD correct?

No, that patch was more-or-less-unrelated cleanup. The question is still
open about what we want to list as required packages here. It seems
somewhat reasonable to assume that people have already managed to build
with the option of interest (eg --with-ldap) before they come to these
test suites ... or am I wrong about that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-06-20 04:32:58 Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-06-20 04:16:55 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons