Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Date: 2018-12-27 17:03:31
Message-ID: 7600048f-1042-3cbd-2215-62bb09fec55f@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/27/18 6:53 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 5:43 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
>
> I think the old CommitFest application let you set the CommitFest via
> the Edit screen also, so you could pick a specific CommitFest to
> target.  But that doesn't seem to exist in Magnus's version.
>
> The basics is, there is not supposed to be more than one Future
> commitfest, in order to keep the workflow as simple as possible. When
> there is, all sorts of bad things happen. What we really should have at
> that point is a blocker so you can't *create* more than one of them, but
> right now it naively assumes nobody does...

Which is ironic since I specifically requested that one be created.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-12-27 17:12:39 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-12-27 16:58:30 Re: GIN predicate locking slows down valgrind isolationtests tremendously