Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow ALTER TABLE ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow ALTER TABLE ...
Date: 2006-02-12 03:34:41
Message-ID: 7523.1139715281@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
>> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions. Nor do I care
>> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.

> OK, how do we proceed? Revert or apply a second patch?

I'd say revert; the patch is going to need significant rework.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James William Pye 2006-02-12 03:54:15 python - fe: Clients can get PANIC ereports too.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 03:30:21 pgsql: Fix more fallout from line-wrap patch, to wit, arbitrarily

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 03:39:44 Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line
Previous Message Sergey E. Koposov 2006-02-12 03:31:13 Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line